Cadence & Winners
Cadence is one of those things that often gets overlooked in the spectrum
of training variables. Everyone talks watts, heart rate, hours,
distance, hills climbed, stress scores, and, for those living in the smoke
and mirrors world of power meters, ATL's, CTL's, IF's etc, etc,
etc.

You rarely hear anyone mention their
cadence. Well cadence is important and I'll try to explain why, right here...
What is it?
First a definition; cadence refers to the average number of
revolutions of the pedals per minute. It's how fast you're
pedalling and it's measured in rpm, revs per minute. So simple
it's ridiculous.
The problem now comes in describing at what cadence it is best
to pedal. Whatever you answer, you're wrong. It should be
faster. At the end of the day (or the race anyway) the person that
can spin the fastest will probably walk away with the spoils. But that
doesn't mean you should ride the whole event at 140 rpm. And here's why.
Gears & Cranks
In the good old days, when sex was safe and car racing was
dangerous, we used to ride six speed, straight through blocks and a 52
outer chain ring with a 42 inner.
Here's one of my old Shimano 600
blocks that I keep as a paper weight. It weighs 330 gms!
The gearing is 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 teeth. And we used to do
Round the Bays on bikes that weighed 23 lb's! Think of that when
you're next riding up Bonne Nuit with your 50x34 and 27 rear plate.
Sorry to get all local for our international readers.
Gearing choice was much more simpler in the 80's than it is today.
Now we have 53 x 39 or 50 x 34 chain rings at the front and 11 speed blocks (I mean
cassettes!) at the back. We now have any combination gearing we want from 11 teeth to
27. We don't need to know the details, but this has become achievable by
lengthening the cage on the rear mech as materials and technology have
advanced.
Anyway, we now have many, many more gear options from which to choose,
so we should be able to keep in our optimal cadence range at all times.
Which brings us to our first stumbling block. What's optimal?
We'll come to that later, but first more theory!
Cadence is affected by many factors. Over one of which you
have no control. Your leg length, or to be more precise your thigh
length. Longer levers exert more pressure for a given force but
are harder to move fast. Think wings of an Albatross versus the
wings of a Humming Bird.
You can optimise this genetic gift/hindrance (delete as
appropriate) by getting the crank length
that best suits your leg length. We now have "standard" options
from 170mm, 172.5mm, and 175mm. Long legs, generally, need long
cranks.

The longer the crank the bigger circle it has to turn, and distance it has to cover, to
complete a full revolution. A 170mm crank covers 1068mm for one
revolution, a 175 crank covers 1099mm. By necessity,
covering a larger distance for a given revolution slows the rev rate of your pedalling.
Everyone say's track cyclists have the highest cadences,
and generally that's right. But track cyclists, so they don't clip
the floor when on the banking, ride 165 mm cranks. As above,
shorter cranks spin smaller
circles so can be spun much quicker than 175's. It's just science
and that's how things work. Little levers, make complete circles,
quicker than big ones.
So, for optimal cadence you need to find your optimal crank
length. You won't always know when you've got it right but you'll
immediately know when you've got it wrong. When I road test bikes,
if they haven't got 172.5 cranks I can tell within the first ten pedal
revs!
Most people settle for the cranks that came with their
first bike and will ride that size for ever more. If that's what
you've done, then don't fret. If you're used to it, leave it.
Try something different in the winter by buying a cheap chainset off
eBay, or
borrowing a mates' and going for a pootle in low gears to get the gist of the
difference.
Cadence + 20
When I initially try to get people to pedal faster their
first move is to go from say 90 rpm to 110 in one hit. They
fatigue very quickly, bounce all over the show, say it's rubbish and go back to their comfort zone. I let them do this to prove my
point and to get them to see how bad it is. We make a big thing
out of it and we laugh at the absurdity of it all. Then we go
about changing it.
Which is where muscle memory comes in to it. We've
known about this phenomenon around 2000 years when Galen (no, not that one)
realised that the brain consciously controls the muscles.
However, if you do a
repetitive task often enough your brain "scales down" it's monitoring
activity and lets your body get on with it all of its own accord.
Freeing up brain power!
Just to show I'm not making it up, I've successfully used
these cognitive development techniques, in a previous life, when I
developed Software for the Mind. It also works on cyclists.
An example? You don't have to think about how to
walk, you just stand up and do it. Under normal circumstances, you
don't have to think about how to pedal. You just do it and your
brain lets the muscles crack on and settle in to their rhythm.
Which is all nice and cosy but what if it's not a particularly efficient
rhythm and has been holding you back all this time?
When you try to up your cadence for extended periods of
time you really, really, really have to think and concentrate about the task at
hand. Your breathing goes to pot, you get stressed and it's all
too easy to snick it up a gear.
Changing your "natural" cadence is hard work but it pays
off handsomely if you persevere. It's a lot more difficult, but a lot more rewarding, than you'd first
think.
The Bounce Test
Bouncing in the saddle isn't a good look. During our early winter
training rides we have a 500 metre "race" where we all choose our lowest
gear and spin, in the saddle, to the imaginary finish line.
It's meant to be
fun, and it is. It's one of the funniest things you'll see on a bike. The
slowest sprint in the world, with leg speeds of 140 rpm plus, and with
grown adults laughing like drains. But it serves a serious purpose. Everyone finds their
"bounce point". Their next objective, throughout
the rest of the winter, is to move this bounce point higher up their rev range.
Try it yourself on the road or turbo. Just make sure
your food, gels and mobile phone are all secured in your back pockets
before they fly up the road.
Ride in a gear lower than normal for the road conditions,
and get to your natrual cadence. Very slowly, start adding a rev
at at a time (say every 30 seconds) until you start to feel slightly
uncomfortable. Now, concentrate on your breathing and leg patterns
and try to keep everything in synch. When you start to bounce,
monitor your sensations, thoughts and actions; then just back off a rev
or two.
You bounce because your leg muscles and foot aren't
relaxing in unison at the bottom of the stroke like they do when you
pedal normally. The timing of your highly sensitive internal clock is out
and it's not happy.
Because
you're going faster than the norm, your leg muscles are misfiring when
the foot hits the bottom of the stroke. As the foot obviously can't go past the end of the
crank, the bum moves away from the saddle. Resulting in the
dreaded bounce.
Addressing the Problem
First off, you need to check your saddle height. Too
low, you'll start bouncing very early. Too high and you'll rock in
the saddle causing other issues. Get someone who knows
to check it out if you're unsure. Then check
your cleats and foot position. You should be aiming for the ball
of the foot to be slightly ahead of the pedal axle.
Finally, you need to practice pedalling circles. Just
because your foot is constrained in to a tangential arc by the
crank doesn't mean you automatically produce power for the full 360
degrees. It's a lot harder to do than you would imagine.
You've
all seen the people that pull their bikes out of the sheds in the spring
and go for a ride while the weather's nice.
Brilliant, I'm not knocking them, at least they're having a
go. But we've all seen them too low in the saddle and stamping on
the pedals. This is how their power production looks through
a power analysis system.
1 & 2 are the dead-spots where no power is produced.
You see they almost meet in the middle and form a figure of eight.
Mildly effective, the bike moves forward, but not very efficient.
At some point or another we all pedal like the recreational
cyclist above. We stamp on the pedals as we
get tired or hit a stupidly steep slope. Don't beat yourself up
about it, just do something to address it and make sure it's a one-off
not the norm.
This
is a reasonable club cyclist. Less of a dead spot at the six
o'clock positions but you can see that dip 2 is closer to the centre
than dip 1. One leg is obviously stronger than the other!
The output is smoother than the above shot, you can see the
lines are closer together but not what you'd call round at the
extremities. Reasonably effective and reasonably efficient.
This
is how a pro pedals. We've moved from a figure of eight, to a
peanut, to a sausage! Pedal force is all the way to the edge of
the chart, the dips at 1 & 2 are still there but much less pronounced.
More force, for more of the circumference, gives a very
effective and a very efficient pedal stroke. This is why we finish
sportive courses an hour behind the pro's!
Concentrate on
pedalling a full, fluid circle. Guide the foot around the
circumference of the full pedal stroke. Don't just push down hard
from the two o'clock to six o'clock position and let the momentum carry
you past the dead spot.
Anti-Bounce Training Drill
A very easy drill to address you pedalling inefficiencies
(don't worry we've all got them) is the one legged pedalling
session.
First off, try it on a turbo or a VERY quiet road,
preferably slightly down hill, Get the bike in a light gear and
unclip one foot, hold it clear of the flailing pedal and for fifteen
seconds just try to pedal in a nice fluid circle. It's a lot
harder than it sounds.
The first thing you notice is the awkwardness at the bottom
of the stroke. That's the bit you concentrate on first. You
are not trying to push a big gear or make your legs stronger; so
use smallish gears and smooth out that dead spot. Then swap legs and try
to build up to a minute at a time.
When the bike stops lurching forward like your swimming the
breast stroke, you've got it cracked. People talk about "scraping
mud off your boot" at the bottom of the stroke. To be honest, I
don't go for that. Relax your foot at the bottom of the stroke,
think circles and DON'T scrunch your toes and try to drag the pedal
around. There should be no tense areas of your body. Relax
your way to speed.
Fluid pedalling is efficient pedalling and efficiency leads
to economy of effort and saving effort wins races. All you have to
do is be smooth, relaxed and circular. How hard can it be?
See above!
Think Fast Think Smooth
When riding on the road, between intervals or on any
endurance or recovery ride, keep asking yourself the same question.
"Can I knock it down a gear and spin faster?" The answer is always
yes. Even if it's just for twenty to thirty seconds.
Keep trying this and keep thinking, always, can I change
down. After a couple of weeks you'll be spinning like a good 'un
and doing it without thinking. If you don't know what to do,
change down. And never, ever, ever, waste an opportunity to pedal
downhill. We'll come back to this in another factsheet later in
the season.
How to Pedal
A lot of riders try to pull up on the pedal with the upcoming leg.
Mainly because it's one of those "traditional" training methods that
seems to have stuck over the years.
But to my mind that steals that leg's recovery phase. You don't
have to pull up, unless you're on a really big climb, just take the
pressure off the pedal. Don't have your upcoming leg working as a
dead weight against the down pushing leg. This game is hard enough
without adding lingering limbs to your challenge.
Many, many riders here in Jersey have tried Power Cranks
(the ones with a ratchet system) but they only ever use them for one
winter. I've never seen them being used two years running and the
same pair has changed hands around ten times on the second hand market!

Bernard Hinault, Marc Gomez and Eddy Merckx (all personal
acquaintances of Mrs Flamme Rouge) never used Power Cranks, or power
meters come to that, but that's for another day. They won
their respective Monuments through fluid, efficient, effective pedal strokes and
more than a smidge of raw talent.
There's many a talented cyclist that pedals anything but
smooth. Our friend Jens Voight is one but there's only one Jens
and we don't have the other physical, psychological and physiological
factors that he has. So we need to learn how to pedal.
Here's a physiological chart of the muscles you use, and
when you use them, to propel your bike onwards and upwards. It all starts from the bum.
It's one of the biggest muscles in your body and for some of us it's
getting bigger. Use it well, it's not just for sitting on.

Why this is important
How many pedal strokes do you use for your event?
Here's a few rough figures.
Local Crit; Quennevais 10
laps, avg cadence 103 rpm, time 29 minutes, 2987 pedal revs.
25 mile Time Trial; time
60 minutes, average cadence 94 rpm, 5640 pedal revs.
Local Road Race; 6 laps
Hougue Bie, avg cadence 89 rpm (lots of freewheeling), time 1:50,
9790 pedal revs.
Big Sportive; Bernard
Hinault, avg cadence 91 rpm, time 5:41, 31031 pedal revs.
Super Sportive;
Quebrantahuesos, avg cadence 87 rpm, time 7:17, 38019 pedal revs.
When your doing a repetitive
task this many times it doesn't take a genius (it didn't) to work out
that small individual gains can give massive returns. Cadence, not
just the quantity but the quality, is vital to helping you realize your
potential.
The Gains in Numbers
Let's start with a 10 mile and 25 mile time trial. I
know there's some of you out there because my Time Trial plans account
for almost 50% of my output! Even though the last time trial I did
was in the Rider Man two stage sportive in 2004, I do know how to make
people faster in them!
Before we start: The numbers in brackets
are gear development (Johnny Foreigner method) which is the distance (in
metres) travelled by one revolution of the crank in that gear. As
shown in this chart.

Distance covered in meters per gear ratio

So, lets start with a ten mile time trial. We'll
assume we've just rode one at an average cadence of 96 rpm, in a 53 x 16
gear which gives 7.0 meters covered per crank revolution. That would give us 2300 pedal revs,
a speed of 24.86 mph and a time of 24:09.
If we used the same gear over the same distance but would
spin it at 97 rpm, we'd achieve a time of 23:54, knocking 15 seconds off
our time. At 96 rpm you cover 768 meters per minute; at 97 rpm you
cover 776 meters per minute.
Extrapolate that out to a 25 mile TT and you'd do an an
hour and 20 seconds at 96 rpm; a good ride but you'd probably feel a
tadge miffed. At 97 rpm you'd knock 37.5 seconds off your time, be
under the hour and on a high for the rest of the week.
The margins really are that close.
If you're not a time-trialler, think how much fresher
you'll be for the sprint if you can save all of your fast-twitch muscle
action for the last hundred metres; rather than burning them all up in
the previous hundred kilometres just to get you there?
The
Message
I'm not asking you to train harder, just
asking you to pedal smarter. This improvement in within all of
you. All you have to do is think about pedalling smoothly and keep
thinking about pedalling smoothly until you don't have to think about it
any more.
We're actually going to get
1% faster just by thinking about how we generate power throughout the
whole pedal stroke. Once you do we can then think about adding a
rev a month to our average cadence.
You might not manage it every
month but come the end of the season you should be 5-6 rpm higher than
you now are. If you carry this in to the winter and can add
another two or three rpm over the out-of-season low gear endurance
phase, you're well on the way to gaining significant power production
for free.
Efficient pedalling is the
icing on the cake you've made through training hard. Races are won
by the smallest margins. If you can sprint one rev faster than the
rider next to you, you'll win the sprint by around 8 metres. And
when's the last time anyone did that?